v0.14.0The dashboard is a product

Comparison · Observability

Iris vs Latitude

MCP-Native Agent Eval vs Open-Source Agent Observability Platform.

TL;DR

Iris is an MCP server your agent discovers and uses on connect — one config block, no SDK, one SQLite file, every rule's precision and recall published at iris-eval.com/proof. Latitude — from its own pages, read 2026-09-21: Latitude is an open-source, MIT-licensed observability platform for production AI agents, operated by Latitude Data, S.L. in Barcelona. It ingests traces through a TypeScript or Python SDK or OpenTelemetry, groups failures into signals, scores sessions with LLM-as-judge, deterministic or JavaScript evaluations, tracks token cost, exposes an MCP server for coding agents, and can be self-hosted for free or run as Latitude Cloud. (source)

Iris grades what an agent did with its tools — the trace, the answer, the cost — not whether an MCP server honours its own contract; a server test harness answers that question, and Iris runs beside it. For the method, see the agent eval guide.

Feature comparison

Side by side.

Twelve features, the same twelve on every comparison. Every Latitude cell links the page it was read from and the date. The highlighted cells are Iris's own call on which side is stronger for a team running MCP agents — 3 to Iris, 2 to Latitude — not a measurement.

FeatureIrisLatitude
Integration methodOne block in the MCP config, no code — the agent discovers Iris and its tools on connectTypeScript (@latitude-data/telemetry) or Python (latitude-telemetry) SDK; OpenTelemetry exporter for other languagesLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
Self-hostingOne process, one SQLite file; Docker image with a health checkFree self-hosting (Docker Compose or Helm): five services + Postgres/pgvector, ClickHouse, Redis, Temporal, object storeLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
Where it runsNothing in the agent's process — Iris is a separate server the agent callsIn-process telemetry SDK in your app, or your existing OpenTelemetry pipeline exporting to Latitude; no proxy describedLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
Evaluation21 built-in deterministic rules and 9 custom-rule types, in-process; 6 judge templates on a key you supply; every rule's precision and recall publishedLLM-as-judge, deterministic conditions or custom JavaScript score completed sessions; human annotations check alignmentLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
Cost trackingPer-trace USD cost and tokens; a cost spike judged against the agent's own historyInput/output/total tokens and estimated cost per trace and session; Cost dashboard with per-model spend, cache adviceLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
MCP supportProtocol-native — Iris is an MCP server with 12 tools; OTLP traces inRemote OAuth MCP server (api.latitude.so/v1/mcp) with tools generated from the Latitude API, for coding agentsLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
LicenseMIT, the whole packageMIT on the default branch (development); the older main branch still carries an LGPL-3.0 LICENSE and READMELatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
OwnershipIndependent and founder-ledOperated by Latitude Data, S.L., Barcelona, Spain; funding and investors are not stated on its pagesLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
DashboardA local dashboard on its own port: traces, moments, regressions, five viewsWeb UI with Traces, Sessions, Signals, Evaluations, Cost, Users, Tools, Memory, Search, Behaviors and Experiments viewsLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
Framework supportAny MCP client (1 verified, 9 claimed — see /clients); OTLP/HTTP from anything elseOpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock, Vercel AI SDK, LangChain and more, plus any OpenTelemetry-compatible applicationLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21
Prompt managementNot includedNot stated in the vendor's documentation as of 2026-09-21Latitude's page · read 2026-09-21
Enterprise and complianceSelf-hosted. Nothing leaves your machine unless you set IRIS_OTEL_ENDPOINT, which exports traces to the collector you name, or enable the LLM judge with your own key. No compliance certification is claimed before it is heldSOC 2 Type II; ISO 27001 reports; GDPR; SAML SSO, RBAC, custom on-prem or cloud deployment on the Enterprise planLatitude's page · read 2026-09-21

Decision guide

Which one fits your stack?

When to choose Iris

  • You are building with MCP-compatible agents and want the integration to be one config block
  • You want the evaluation to be deterministic and local — no model call, nothing leaving the machine
  • You want to read what each rule is worth before you trust it: every rule's precision and recall is published
  • You want self-hosting to be one process and one file
  • You want a fully permissive MIT license on the whole package

When to choose Latitude

  • You need to self-host the entire platform for free on Docker Compose or Kubernetes, with your data staying in your own infrastructure. source
  • You need recurring production failures auto-grouped into tracked signals with status, size and trend, Sentry-style. source
  • You need a fix loop that dispatches Claude Code or Cursor with the failing traces and replays the fix against those traces. source
  • You need a Cost dashboard with per-model economics and cache recommendations computed from your own traffic. source
  • You need OpenTelemetry-native ingestion from any language, not only Python or TypeScript. source

Sources

Every Latitude statement on this page was read from one of these pages on the date shown. The file behind this page is website/src/lib/compare/latitude.json.

Last verified: 2026-09-21. This comparison is based on publicly available documentation and may not reflect recent changes to Latitude. We aim to keep this page accurate and fair.

See something outdated or incorrect? Report an inaccuracy — we review and update within 48 hours.

Ready to see what your agents are doing?

Add Iris to your MCP config. First trace in 60 seconds. No SDK, no signup, no infrastructure.